William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tom Bradford wrote:
I remember reading that the dependency on memory pools was going to
be modified so that a developer would have a choice in allocation
between memory pooling and some other method. I was wondering what
the 'other method' would be, and if the developer herself could
assert some control over it.
This already existed and has been abandoned. Please look for the apr_sms
api in http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr/trunk/rev=62380 and study
the apr list archives at that time for the rational of why this was thrown
out in 62381.
Sorry - better link;
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/apr/trunk/?rev=62380
