On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:38:46AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On 5/19/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Arghhh!!! It's transparent, not opaque, so this cannot be solved quite > >this way until 2.0. I'd be interested to learn which casts masked this > >flaw. > > BTW, is it intended that apr_sdbm is a public API, or an accident that > apr_sdbm.h is in a public folder?
I haven't checked the history, there may have been a time when mod_dav was using it directly; mod_dav-for-1.3 embedded a copy of SDBM. Not sure if there are any direct users remaining or whether it could be hidden in the next apr-util major version bump (or whether it's worth hiding if we're always going to build the code anyway). joe
