Just going through the "bind arguments" portion of the patch. In the new code, %s expects BLOB - is this intentional? I would think more people would intuitively think of %s as a zero terminated string...
-- Bojan
Just going through the "bind arguments" portion of the patch. In the new code, %s expects BLOB - is this intentional? I would think more people would intuitively think of %s as a zero terminated string...
-- Bojan