Max Bowsher wrote:
david reid wrote:
Given the talk over last few days about changes to error handling and
the io abstraction stuff, is it time to think about starting a 2.0
development branch?
If a branch is to be created, I'd suggest either a feature development
branch, or a 1.x maintenance branch. It is rather unusual for a trunk
to exist, but not be the highest version.
Hey, I don't care what it's called. I could care less if we decide to
start using daft names for them, just it seems as though there should be
somewhere that 2.0 dev can start.
