Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... Is there any reason that shouldn't be added to APR? It would
> >seem that would make something running under Win32/APR behave more like
> >Unix/APR and therefore encourage the P is for Portability...
> Because it's impossible to implement portably. There's no good way to
> figure out that a specific filesystem is actually capable of using
> sparse files.
So what happens on windows when you use the sparse file flag on a
filesystem that doesn't support sparse files?
Thanks,
Tyler
