At 04:30 AM 7/12/2006, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:20:03PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 7/10/06, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is there any reason why the "z" modifier is not included here?
It seems like
> >that is what printf(3) says we want to use for formatting size_t
types.
>
> Off the top of my head I'm not sure, perhaps configure just isn't
> smart enough to use that if it's available? I'm also not sure if
the
> apr *printf code knows about that format code...
It doesn't, but there's no reason why it couldn't be added. The
APR_{S,}SIZE_T_FMT macros are completely redundant if the z modifier
is
supported, I don't know why that wasn't done to start with, it has
meant
a lot of ugly code in a lot of places.
I had to go to a Unix system to look up what the "z" meant, because
Windows printf doesn't have it. I think that the corresponding flag
on Windows is "I".
To specify ptrdiff_t (that is, __int32 on 32-bit platforms, __int64
on 64-bit platforms), Use prefix I, With type specifier d, i, o, x,
or X.
To specify size_t (that is, unsigned __int32 on 32-bit platforms,
unsigned __int64 on 64-bit platforms), Use prefix I, With type
specifier o, u, x, or X.
