Paul Querna wrote:
Er. I'm sorry I didn't revert it in under 24 hours, but like, I wasn't just reading email and hanging out with my machine ready to revert a commit right after I made it. Like i said earlier, I will try to get to it tonight, we all have busy schedules, so don't lay down this bullshit that its bad etiquette to not revert a commit as quickly as you would like.
I was reading something quite different, as in, the longer it sits there the more likely the veto is to be forgotten/overlooked. This has happened here in the past and won't be tollerated again ;-) A couple days - that's fine. Thank you for the ack, it's what I was looking for. IMHO if one has cycles to debate, one has cycles to commit, so leaving the code in-tree without expressing an interest in reverting it yourself certainly looked deliberately belligerent. Bill
