Nick Kew wrote: > On Tuesday 01 August 2006 10:07, david reid wrote: >> Having looked at these, they're small and self contained and would seem >> to be a good fit for apr-util. Question is where/how would they go in? > > +1 in principle, and I agree apr_uri is not a great match. > Maybe it would fit as a new apr_uriencode source file in the /uri/ directory?
Right, but what would the functions be called? Also, I image we would provide a way to encode/decode the relevant parts of the apr_uri structure... david
