On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:30:14PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > It occurs to me WHY did we use APR_CHECK_FILE() instead of AC_CHECK_FILE()? > What does it buy us? > > I'd rather just chuck crufty macros rather than 'fix' them, when it's > sufficiently covered already by autoconf.
Seems reasonable, I don't know of any reason why AC_CHECK_FILE isn't used instead. It is present back to autoconf 2.13 so this is not a problem for APR 0.9. Regards, joe
