Greg Marr wrote: > At 05:44 PM 9/15/2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> It seems, then, that this will become one of two different solutions, >> with your DllMain alternative implementation that will need to be >> compiled >> if we discover we are building to a dynamic library for non-x86 >> targets :( >> >> Perhaps VC8 actually has a solution, I can revisit since it's not >> unreasonable >> to demand the modern compiler as a minimum baseline for modern CPU's. > > Isn't VC8 required for non-x86 anyway?
That's my theory, but I haven't dissected the internals of the CRT for 8 just yet. And relying on internals can always be a dicey thing if there isn't a track record to point to.
