Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 11/10/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone have issues with me making from an >> optional argument, i.e. allowing from to be >> NULL and apr_socket_recvfrom() doing the Right >> Thing? >> >> In other words, making it more recvfrom()-like? > > Seems reasonable to me.
Can you splash up to the list what the new .h doxygen comments would look like?
