Um, why are you doing that?
no 'um' required :-)
(1) because my notes had a TODO "in there" -- which usually means i
was told to (sometime, somewhere, by someone, ... etc etc)
(2) because i assumed, apparently, mistakenly that as 'apr' goes, so
does 'apr-util'
(3) and, posting here, because it was suggested that i do so
APR-util doesn't use GNU libtool directly
- it uses the GNU libtool from APR (via apr-*-config --link-libtool) .
i had not realized that.
and, checking for my own sanity,
grep -rlni libtoolize .
./apr-trunk/.svn/text-base/buildconf.svn-base
./apr-trunk/.svn/text-base/configure.in.svn-base
--> ./apr-trunk/buildconf
./apr-trunk/configure.in
./apr-util-trunk/xml/expat/.svn/text-base/buildconf.sh.svn-base
./apr-util-trunk/xml/expat/buildconf.sh
grep -rlni AC_PROG_RANLIB .
./apr-trunk/.svn/text-base/configure.in.svn-base
--> ./apr-trunk/configure.in
grep -rlni AC_PROG_LIBTOOL .
./apr-trunk/.svn/text-base/configure.in.svn-base
--> ./apr-trunk/configure.in
all's clear/understood now.
thanks.
-1 on adding AC_PROG_LIBTOOL to apr-util - it's just not needed.
i actually wasn't proposing a vote, but fair enough. :-)
thanks.
