I was wondering if there's any reason why an apr_table_pool_get() function isn't currently implemented?

I can do it myself, except that I'm not sure if it would be more intelligent to manually implement it (return t->a.pool) or using the standard APR_POOL_IMPLEMENT_ACCESSOR (which would require adding an apr_pool_t to the apr_table_t structure and do "table->pool = table->a.pool" immediately after creating the table).

Comments?

 Issac

Reply via email to