Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 1/3/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > We've long talked about merging APR and APR-util into one library >> for 2.0. >> >> Pointers?!? > > Here on the list and at every hackathon/ApacheCon for the last few years.
Searching body text of the history for 'merge apr' or 'combine apr' yields no results, pointer please. Undocumented hackathon discussions are not valid citations. >> Now - I thought the public discussion lists were moving twords disolving >> APR-util into smaller libraries, dependent on specific features that >> wouldn't swallow the entire world of unnecessary library functionality >> into every runtime? > > That's part of the discussions that have been here on list, but > frankly, I've never seen anyone say how a dynamic APR would work > reliably. In fact, I think the eventual consensus was that > splitting-off approach could never work at all. Where is that documented? Please don't start a thread on "Our agreed way to ..." when in fact there's no documented technical discussion, and start a fresh thread to attempt to argue that svn or log4cxx really needs to load libldap/liblber.
