On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:19:07 +0000 david reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[aaargh! You copied me, and I just hit reply when it should've gone to the list. I prefer just the one copy of your mail, which should be the one arriving from the list] > Actually I think wrowe had an interesting point - if we get this right > is there a reason for apr-util anymore? Removing the divide may well > make things easier and would reduce our development overhead. > Agreed. I was kind-of taking it as implicit that the distinction, insofar as it lives on, is between a core library (libapr) with minimal or no dependencies, and a bunch of dynamically loadable modules corresponding broadly to the current apr-util. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/ -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
