On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:12:42 +0000 Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:49:11AM -0500, Tom Donovan wrote: > > re: "we don't support out-of-tree DBD drivers" > > > > That's where I completely misunderstood. I was imagining DBD > > drivers to be analogous to httpd modules, i.e. static linking a few > > APR-supplied modules doesn't imply that 3rd-party-supplied dso > > modules can't be used. > > I can't say whether it was the deliberate intent of those writing the > DBD code, but the status quo is that the driver interface > (apr_dbd_internal.h) is not part of the public APR-util interface. > So the status quo is that out-of-tree drivers are not supported. The intention was that apr_dbd_internal.h should be used by DBD drivers but opaque to applications. Is there a better way to express that, that'll properly support out-of-tree drivers? -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
