Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 03/30/2007 07:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> I'd like to lay these tags down and roll candidates this Saturday. >> >> That said, I'm willing to be a tiny bit patient if someone needs all >> of Saturday, even into Sunday, to squish a few more gnats. >> >> apr-iconv in particular has quite a few 64-bit-isms fixed now. >> >> Speak now :) > > Do you mean 1.2.9?
Heh. > Do you only plan to roll 1.2.x or also 0.9.x? There was a significant regression in 1.2.8 sockaddr's on win32 for AcceptEx fill-in-the-socket feature that doesn't apply to 0.9. That doesn't mean I won't - what say you all for 0.9.14?
