On 4/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wondering where we would like to inject doxygen for tracking such issues.
Which issues are those? code comments?
Perhaps within severity, since we are using the component field to track apr v.s. apr-util v.s. apr-iconv (and soon, probably, more apr component units.)
Using severity seems odd ... unless all documentation "bugs" are deemed to be of lesser importance than all of the "trivial" real code bugs. :-) A component tree for apr-doc, apr-util-doc, etc could work? Then severity can be used to determine which code comments (or lack thereof) are more problematic than others. On 4/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another alternative to consider, keyword Document or Doxygen.
using keywords as a short term solution is probably a good idea as it doesnt take over any of the existing fields. -- John
