Davi Arnaut wrote: > > See my email about it, message id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It boils down to a combination of ai_flags = AI_ADDRCONFIG and "::1" > (loopback address). The test is wrong, it should expect a failure (with > the current network_io code adding the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag).
Thanks for the research, which solution do we want? [ ] undo the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag which interferes with loopback? [ ] document that loopback isn't a valid address? I'm guessing the former. Bill
