Yeah. That doesn't look right. On 9/19/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (alternative subject: Jeff asks dumb FAQ about apr-util version expectations) > > AFAICT, apr-util is picking up > > ./build/rules.mk:APR_DOTTED_VERSION=1.2.11 > ./build/rules.mk:LINK = $(LIBTOOL) $(LTFLAGS) --mode=link > $(LT_LDFLAGS) $(COMPILE) -version-info 2:11:2 $(ALL_LDFLAGS) -o $@ > > > from apr's rules.mk in order to determine its library name. > > So something which is supposedly apr-util 1.2.10 has a shared library > called libaprutil-1.so.0.2.11 >
-- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
