Jeff Trawick wrote: > On 10/5/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I really wonder, if z/OS is so crippled, if we shouldn't simply >> recommend using apr-iconv? > > that's a lot of punishment for not supporting "ISO-8859-1" ;) users > of apr apps can't use the same transformations that they use with > other apps (ftp, telnet, and everything else)
Recommend isn't punishment (demand might be ;-) But my question is, if this is unrecognized, the default iconv is likely to have other deficiencies. I will be rolling apr 1.2.1 shortly based on win32 build fixes, and would encourage any patches which make it easier to (optionally) build this on unix and derivatives.
