Eric Covener wrote: > On 10/6/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43563 >> >> This patch looks reasonable to me; any thoughts from the Windows crowd? >> > > 43522 is a close cousin: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43522 > > I believe last sentiment from Bill was that this is backportable > (although it's not in trunk yet)
Yes - the baseline fix of return APR_EAGAIN was critical, but the other patch would also be desirable to make this behavior consistent to unix, and it's so trivial to override by setting an explicit timeout. FYI trunk has one fail-case right now in testdup, investigating. Bill
