Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Oct 9, 2007 10:48 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [X] retain versioning as-is, e.g. 1.3.0 is our next potential 'GA release' > > If we have API-incompatible changes, then start the 2.x.x process - > but us distributing 1.x.x with in-flux APIs is insane. -- justin
One can argue bopping from 2.x.x to 3.x.x. to 4.x.x is much more asinine, as it would give API users no possibility of settling on a supported version with major releases every 6 to 12 months for API-breaking changes.
