On 9/18/07, Lucian Adrian Grijincu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if an APR_INO_T_FMT is needed and whether it can be added to > 1.2.x or 0.9.x branches. >
For whatever reason someone might want to print an apr_ino_t. As I understand the versoining rules, this can't be added in neither 0.9 nor 1.2, but can make it in 1.3. Is there a need for such a #define? If yes, I'll update the updated patch Joe sent to include this too (only on trunk which I think is the 1.3 wannabe). -- Lucian
