On Nov 3, 2007 5:57 AM, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm verifying non-breakage on aix and hp pa-risc (no ia32/64 boxes around), > > and am backporting DSO detection if I don't find a flaw in the next few > > hours. > > Then I'll skip those until we have a release candidate. I just tried apr-1.2.x vs. apr-1.2.11 on HP-UX PA-RISC 11iv1... compiler warnings same before and after config detection/decisions as reflected in config.status are the same, other than the new logic for finding STRUCT_STAT_ST_BLOCKS and SYS_PARAM_H but testshm failing for me with 1.2.x but not 1.2.11 Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (22): Invalid argument (new code added to testshm.c after 1.2.11) Maybe I can look further tonight... No time to play with apr-util ATM.
