On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:22:43AM -0600, William Rowe wrote: > DBM/DBD are on the right-track. But not yet on unix. I hope to have the > working "dynamic" build of these db providers working on unix by end of mo, > because it's critical to one of my own projects.
Can you explain what is not "on the right track" about the existing DBD DSO work? > If LDAP/expat/ssl can be similarly refactored, and only dynaload once the > specific apr object is initialized, Can you be more specific about what you are proposing here? Only "dynaload" what exactly? The actual LDAP/expat/ssl library? joe
