On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To quote what Roy put into his sandbox at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/wakad/README.txt: > > "Don't knock over my castle."
That's a sandbox - not something that is intended to be in a release. Please don't take things out of context. APR has strict compatibility rules, so if this code were to make it into 1.3, then we can't alter the API until 2.0. > Every time you veto something instead of engaging someone in a discussion > to resolve the issues, you are knocking over that person's sandcastle. And > every time you do that, you are giving that person one less reason to bother > code up anything at all. No, as Joe said, you ignored prior comments - this isn't the first time that these concerns have been raised. > You have raised some valid points which need to be addressed in the current > code. Unfortunately you delivered those points with the blunt instrument of > the -1, and as a result the SSL part of the code has effectively been > withdrawn, and any chance of those issues ever being addressed has been > vastly reduced if not eliminated entirely. If and when you wish to address *all* of the issues, I (and I think Joe too; but I can't speak for him) will be happy to see it back on trunk. But, releasing a half-completed API in 1.3 is extreme badness. -- justin
