On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:24:31 -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The suggestion for apr_bucket_alloc to fail more cleanly r582228 made apr_bucket_alloc return NULL. ( I've just become aware of it. ) > for apr_allocator_alloc to win a new abort_fn hook, I'm not sure why apr_allocator_t with abort_fn resolves the issue. Not apr_allocator_t but apr_bucket_alloc_t should have abort_fn ?
