On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 17:33 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Interesting thought, keep in mind the other half of the issue is the number
> of times we consume generate_random_bytes ourselves from other functions,
> you'll have to suggest which should be pseudo, which should be truly random
> and which should be configurable.

Bill, are we doing something about this before 1.3.0 gets out?

-- 
Bojan

Reply via email to