William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Any problems I backport the
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=657500&view=rev
to 1.2 and 1.3 ?
I'm only worried about misuse; could you add a doxygen note that removing
the shm while in-use is absolutely not portable?
Think that docs clearly state that its not portable.
However I'm more worried about the following statement:
"The pool cleanup of apr_shm_create (apr_shm_destroy)
also removes the named resource"
Now this is not true for win32, because the created
file never gets deleted afterwards, so IMHO this
should be fixed by actually deleting the mapping file
in shm_cleanup (distinguishing create/attach of course)
Regards
--
^(TM)
