>>> On 5/22/2008 at 10:53 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Are we planning on doing the APR 1.2 and/or 1.3 releases soon? >> Let me know what I can do to help to get this along. > > The biggest help right now is to ensure apr-1.3 is ready. apr-util-1.3 > should be done in just a bit, I'm testing the modular dso logic. > > I thought apr was, but from my last comments about the crypto error codes > to nowhere, it obviously isn't quite ready. > > So the best help anyone could offer is to simply diff apr-1.2 branch > to the apr-1.3 branch, and determine if anything else nefarious has > crept in, or if any of the new prototype declarations in the include/ > tree are nonsensical. (e.g. out arg as the last not first arg, etc). > > And best yet, a +/- and explanation once anyone completes this effort.
Currently 1.3.x won't build on NetWare due to the DSO changes. Because of the way that APU_DSO_BUILD is defined and used in the code, NetWare won't build with APU_DSO_BUILD turned on or off. Brad
