On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 12:39 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Do you know offhand that multiple AC_CACHE_VAL( ac_cv_val, ...) entries > are legit? Provided they are, your patch appears to handle all of the > nesting without introducing other duplications!
The AC_CACHE_VAL should be changed to AC_CACHE_CHECK, which then provides pretty printing of messages for non-nested version of checks. -- Bojan
