On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 12:10 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:

> Hmmm.  handle->handle appears already void* in arch/unix/apr_arch_dso.h.

However, &handle->handle, which is actually used here, is (void **),
hence the warning.

> Just wondering if shl_t should be apr_os_dso_handle_t, and if so
> whether the latter is incorrectly defined on this platform?

I don't think that's the case.

-- 
Bojan

Reply via email to