On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:54 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> [email protected] wrote: >>> require apr 2 - might want to review other libs (expat 2.0 baseline, >>> anyone?) >> 2.0.1 is out. Is there any reason to not use that ? > > The question is, do we demand 2.0.0 or later? 2.0.0 shipped three years > ago. Group's call.
I'd rather not bump just for bumping's sake unless there's some particular feature that we need. AFAIK, there isn't, so I'd prefer that we stay as-is. -- justin
