Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 04/03/2009 04:31 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: mturk >> Date: Fri Apr 3 14:31:16 2009 >> New Revision: 761692 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761692&view=rev >> Log: >> Make final_block dynamic. >> It is used only so we can create our mutex that will survive pool_clear > > Why? The original intention was to reduce malloc and free calls. Your > change introduces additional ones for no real merit. At least I can see > none. >
It reduces the pool size by one block_list_t in 99.9% of the cases. This one is used only if you do: a = apr_allocator_create p = apr_pool_create_ex( ... a) This peace of code is very rare. Regards -- ^(TM)
