On 28.06.2009 10:45, Paul Querna wrote: > This was committed back in February, in r744095, and r744552. > > It added a poll() based backend for pollcb. > > The problem is that this backend is not thread safe, while all of the > others are -- and it was my intention that by default all backends are > thread safe, which is a departure from the previous pollset API. > > I believe that it should return ENOTIMPL until such a time that it > could be made thread safe (ie, add or remove while a _poll() is going > on). > > Thoughts?
Seems to make sense to me. Regards Rüdiger
