On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 00:22 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > FYI only the 1st and 3rd bits of the patch you quoted were necessary, > the second bit was already set volatile.
Yeah, sorry about that. Just did a really quick diff on my local trees here. >From memory, the only thing that should affect those "dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules" warning with bucket brigades is the bit where we change (hp) to (&(hp)->next). -- Bojan
