On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 13:09 +0200, Aleric Inglewood wrote: > Now we have to decide whether to use one APR memory pool per thread or, > to allow multiple thread to use the same apr_pool_t undercertain > circumstances.
This is a cut'n'paste of my own reply from an old thread (no other committer corrected me than, so I guess it still stands): Pools are explicitly thread unsafe, so if you you are doing something to the same pool from two different threads, you must synchronise using your own mutex. -- Bojan
