Robert Dailey wrote: > > Yes, it works as expected if I keep the directories as siblings as you > mentioned. I have one unrelated question, though. I mentioned this > earlier too. > > The NEON library (I think that's the one) expects the apr libraries to > be in a "Release" directory (e.g. apr\Release\apr-1.lib). So my question > is: Which library is broken? Is NEON wrong to assume the libraries will > be located in such a directory, or is APR wrong for putting the final > libraries in a LibR directory instead of a Release directory?
NEON has the issue; an installed tree has bin/, lib/, include/ etc. They will break if you build for NT only, for example. > Thanks for your time. No bother, thanks for the research!
