On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > too trivial for CHANGES... waste of time for people looking there for > > interesting changes... > > It was contributed by someone external to apr, and having banged my head > against the same shortcomings in documentation, such contributions are > very valuable and should be properly credited. > I don't mind the general idea of giving a little boost to the perceived importance of an outside contribution in order to justify listing it in CHANGES. However, at the current rate I suspect that CHANGES will be half drivel before long.
