Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Author: jim > Date: Thu Sep 17 14:39:29 2009 > New Revision: 816217 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=816217&view=rev> > Log: > Using apr-util > > Modified: > apr/apr/branches/1.4.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c > > > apr/locks using the still-separate apr-util just seems hokey/totally > unexpected and brings in a surprising dependency > > are there other examples of apr depending on apr-util?
No, my previous attempts were successfully vetoed, for good justifications. That was why I answered Neil that it is never intentional to have apr dependencies upon apr-util.
