On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should we do something similar to what is done with httpd regarding > CHANGES. That is, apr-trunk just includes changed to 2.0 that > are NOT in 1.4 (or earlier) and does not try to keep the 1.4 ( > and earlier) changes in there; and 1.4 does keep 1.3, etc... > > Make sense? > I was just composing the same e-mail ;) YES And once there is a 1.4.x release we start maintaining applicable changes in both 1.3.x and 1.4.x since we need to reflect what was fixed after the last 1.4.x release. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien...
