On 10/07/2009 06:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> This is still confusing... "if true, then the next
> read will return APR_EOF" but doesn't it return true if
> there is still stuff to read?
> 
> How about "Check whether the receive part of the socket is
> still connected and not shutdown by...."

Good catch. I let myself confuse from the mail.

How about:

* Check whether the send part of the socket is still open on the
* peer or that there is still data in the socket's read buffer.
* If this is false the next read on the socket will return APR_EOF.


Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to