On 10/07/2009 06:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > This is still confusing... "if true, then the next > read will return APR_EOF" but doesn't it return true if > there is still stuff to read? > > How about "Check whether the receive part of the socket is > still connected and not shutdown by...."
Good catch. I let myself confuse from the mail. How about: * Check whether the send part of the socket is still open on the * peer or that there is still data in the socket's read buffer. * If this is false the next read on the socket will return APR_EOF. Regards RĂ¼diger
