On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: >> Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >>> I believe the key differences are in there. I'll add back the "disabled >>> by default" aspect. First, >>> please call out explicitly the other CHANGES entries I removed for which >>> you would like an explanation. >> >> wrowe has made a number of calls for people to review the crypto code in >> APR v1.4, and the entries in CHANGES are a key part of such a review. >> >> As I requested in my previous mail, please revert (as in, -1).
This is not subject to veto. > <I've omitted the combination of the apr_crypto new-feature entries, > which we discussed earlier and which I'm already said I'd change once > I understand what to do with the rest.> I just restored the missing piece of information (build disabled by default). I hope this helps.
