On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 00:16, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> >> The SVN API uses apr_pool_t. That typedef could disappear in APR 2.x, >> breaking our 1.x APIs. >> >> Thus, we cannot and will not support APR 2.x in the SVN 1.x series. > > could -> cannot/will not ? what a leap. > > Gheesh, seriously, sounds like your polite point of [oh, and 0.9 but we > don't talk about that :-] > > Maybe apr_pool_t goes poof, most likely it doesn't, and either way it's > entirely possible to do this. You are simply being woodenheaded :)
My point was that *anything* could change and create a source/binary compatibility problem. And in all likelihood, something *will* change that we rely upon. One more argument to one function would bring down the house. That is all it takes. There isn't wiggle room here. Cheers, -g
