Neil Conway wrote: >> pollset_wakeup shouldn't exist imo, its place is in something like the >> apr_events_* api that was proposed and never adopted at one point, but >> it was added anyways because of a use case needed by tomcat nc (?) > > I agree that a higher-level events API would be useful, but in the > absence of that, pollcb_wakeup() would be pretty useful: wakeup() + a > secondary event queue is a reasonable substitute for a general-purpose > event notification system. IMHO a lot of people will basically need to > roll this functionality by hand in the absence of a builtin > pollcb_wakeup(). > > If a patch for pollcb_wakeup() would be considered or accepted, I can > look into writing one.
+1 for a pollcb_wakeup(). Sure, an apr_events API would be an excellent thing to have, but we don't have it right now, and people have problems they need solved. Regards, Graham --
