I'm a bit undecided whether to port some changes between APR and APR-UTIL branches:

- r780882 (wrowe): fix vpath building for xml/expat (removing "configure" target in Makefile.in) The change is in the 1.3.x branch, but neither in any older nor newer branches.

- r979102 (rjung): Updating buildconf.sh and configure.in for in xml/expat to allow building with libtool 2. Applied to 1.5, 1.4 and 1.3. Should I backport to older branches, or do we want to stay very conservatve here? I'd say backport, because otherwise we might run into the same problem we had with the first tarball for 2.2.16 again, namely that the machine of the RM is to modern, even when preparing e.g. an httpd 2.0 release.

- r979109 (rjung): Updating config.guess and config.sub to allow for better detection of modern platforms. Applied to APR 1.3, ..., trunk and apr-util 1.3, ..., 1.5. I suggest applying to the old branches as well.

Regards,

Rainer

Reply via email to