On 8/3/2010 1:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > fine so far, but also bad since shouldnt we at least make sure that APR > itself builds without apu.h? There are still a bunch of headers which > want to include apu.h - is it ok that I change them all to apr.h, or do > I have to mimic this dummy apu.h creation?
Yes, and yes (for external users). apu.h should be nothing but a stub, and there is no reason to actually generate the dummy header, it should simply exist in include/ (and did the last time I looked?).
