On 3/20/2011 1:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > The comment caused me to wonder if there is some confusion still, > so I thought it would be worthwhile to point this out. The flag > APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES never had anything to do with any gcc defines, > per say, only that >4gb files are legitimate and addressable by our > apr_off_t type.
And note the verb... _HAVE_ represent autoconf detected features... _HAS_ describes apr capabilities.
