On Friday 15 April 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 4/15/2011 6:36 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In order to disambiguate what was released by external entities > >> from what the ASF APR Project has voted upon and released, > > > > are you referring to some apr-util-1.4.0 RPM from opensuse.org, > > or something else? > > archive.a.o/dist/httpd/httpd-2.3.4-alpha-deps.tar.gz; > > httpd-2.3.4-alpha/srclib/apr-util/include/apr_crypto.h > > to be very specific.
> [X] Stay at apr-util 1.4.0 for the next pre-2.0 release > [ ] Bump to apr-util 1.4.1 for the next pre-2.0 release > [ ] Bump to apr-util 1.5.0 for the next pre-2.0 release I really don't think we need to care about compatibility in/with alpha tarballs. > Before we ship 2.0, we have to introduce some mechanism to preview > alpha/beta features, if we don't want to continue this stagnation > through the 2.0 lifespan. Odds/evens versioning might be the > solution, but we should come up with some consensus before 2.0.0 > is blessed. That sounds like a good idea.
